11 Advantages Of Having 50 Churches Of 100 Instead Of 1 Church Of 5,000

Church planters are some of the great heroes of the faith. Especially when you realize how many church plants fail within the first few years. But I wonder, how many failed churches might still be alive and well today if we didn’t pressure them to reach numerical goals that most churches, even after decades of existence, fail to achieve? What would happen if, instead of sending one church planter to start a church, hoping for it to reach (to pick an arbitrary number) 5,000 attendees, we sent out 50 church planters, and resourced them with the tools to grow to 100 on average? Not that every church will reach 100. Some will be bigger, some will be smaller. But if the expectation was 50 churches of 100, instead of one church of 5,000, how would it change the way we plant, resource and encourage churches? And what if we applied that same logic to our existing churches?

https://www.flickr.com/photos/31246066@N04/7291705744/How many failed churches might still be alive and well today if we didn’t pressure them to reach numerical goals that most churches, even after decades of existence, fail to achieve?

What would happen if, instead of sending one church planter to start a church, hoping for it to reach (to pick an arbitrary number) 5,000 attendees, we sent out 50 church planters, and resourced them with the tools to grow to 100 on average?

Read more at Pivot

Author

Want to reprint this article? Click here for permission. (This protects me from copyright theft.)

Share or Print this!

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email
Print